Robert of Farndale

 

c 1300 to c 1360

 

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

 

The First Family Tree

The Medieval Inhabitants of Farndale

 

Robert was outlawed for hunting

 

FAR00012

 

Home Page

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

Return to the Home Page of the Farndale Family Website

The Farndale Story

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

The story of one family’s journey through two thousand years of British History

The Farndale Lineages

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

The 83 family lines into which the family is divided. Meet the whole family and how the wider family is related

The Farndale Directory

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

Members of the historical family ordered by date of birth

Themes

Links to other pages with historical research and related material

Related Family Stories

The story of the Bakers of Highfields, the Chapmans, and other related families

 

 

Dates are in red.

Hyperlinks to other pages are in dark blue.

Headlines are in brown.

References and citations are in turquoise.

Context and local history are in purple.

 

 

1300

 

If Robert was aged about 30 when he was outlawed in 1330, he might have been born in about 1296, the son of Peter de Farndale (FAR00008).

1330

 

The family seem to have been in Rosedale in 1330.

In 1330, Richard Mosyn, of that part of Rossedale which belongs to the Abbot of S. Mary's (i.e. Rosedale West), William Troten of Spaunton, Roger del Mulne of Farndale, Robert (FAR00012) son of Peter (FAR00008) of Rossedale, Walter Blackhous of Farndale (BLA00001), went on a Monday in January to some unknown place within the forest and killed a soar and slew a hart with bows and arrows. All are outlawed. If we are right about his age, he was about sixty five by then.

A hart is a male deer and a soar is a sow or pig.

24 September 1332

 

A screenshot of a computer screen

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

 

Outlaws of Flaskes

 

Robert Farndale (FAR00031) son of Simon the miller of Farndale (FAR00021), and Robert Farndale (FAR00012) son of Peter of Farndale (FAR00008), were fined for poaching at Pickering Castle in 1332 Patent Rolls, North Riding Records, York, The Honour and Forest of Pickering, Volume II, The Coucher Book of the Duchy of Lancaster Records, page 66). Robert was outlawed with others for killing a hart in the forest. On 24 September 1332, Robert Farndale (FAR00031) son of Simon (FAR00021) hunted a stag at Flaskes in Pickering Forest.

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect. 

Afterwards some of the gang were redeemed on payments of fines but the Roberts did not appear and were the be searched for.

See details and research notes.

 

13 March 1334

More Poachers

Nicholas of Farndale (FAR00022), gave bail for Roger (FAR00013A) son of Gilbert of Farndale (FAR00018) who had been caught poaching in 1334 and 1335. Robert (FAR00031) son of Simon the miller of Farndale (FAR00021) and Robert (FAR00012), son of Peter of Farndale (FAR00008) were co-offenders. 

See details and research notes.

 

 

3 October 1334

 

At a hearing at Pickering before Justices Richard Willoughby and John de Hambury on 3 October 1334, a long list of offenders including Robert (FAR00031), son of Simon of Farndale (FAR00021), Roger del Milne of Farndale (FAR00013A), Robert (FAR00012), son of Peter de Farndale (FAR00008), Walter Blachose (BLA00001), Ralph del Heued (HEU00002), were ordered for apprehension by the sheriff by Easter 1335 (The Great Cowcher of the Duchy of Lancaster, The National Archives, DL42/1 Folio 276v to 277v).

 

2 January 1335

The Buck and the Stag

On 2 January 1335, Roger the Miller of Farndale (FAR00013A), Robert (FAR00012), son of Peter of Farndale (FAR00008), Walter Blakhous of Farndale (BLA00001), and Ralph de Heued of Farndale (HEU00002) came into Pickering Forest at an unknown place with bows and arrows and killed one four-year-old buck and hunted one stag and carried away with them the game and thereupon they did their will. They were ordered to appear at a hearing of the matter on 3 October 1334, but although they were living in the country, they did not appear. Therefore the sheriff was ordered to make them come. However the Sheriff failed to apprehend them, since they had withdrawn into hiding, and so the search was continue while meantime they were declared to be outlaws (The Great Cowcher of the Duchy of Lancaster, The National Archives, DL42/1 Folio 222, DL 42/1/35/U9, Folio 221v to 223v).

See details and research notes.

 

13 March 1335

Poachers

Pleas were held at Pickering on Monday 13 March 1335,  before Richard de Willoughby and John de Hambury. A long list of names including Robert (FAR00031), son of Simon de Farndale (FAR00021), Roger del Milne of Farndale (FAR00013A), and Robert (FAR00012), son of Peter of Farndale (FAR00008) were convicted before the Justices on the evidence of the foresters, verderers, and other officers. They did not appear, and the Sheriff gave evidence that they could not be found and had nothing in his bailiwick by means of which they could be attached. The sheriff was therefore ordered to seize and secure them, so that he could produce them before the Justices on Monday, 15 May 1335. There are records of further hearings in the matter on 22 September 1337 and 29 March 1338 when they could still not be found. At a hearing on 15 September 1338 the sheriff was ordered to search for them from county to county and they were to be outlaws if they still failed to appear. Were he to find them the sheriff was ordered to take steps in such a way that he has their bodies here at this day to make satisfaction to the earl about their redemption for trespasses of hunting whereof they are convicted before the said justices by the foresters, verderers and other ministers. (North Riding Records Yorks Volume III, The Honour and Forest of Pickering, 1894, Edited Robert Bell Turton, page 67, The National Archives DL 42/1/30/U1 (Folios 284v to 286),  DL 42/1/31/U1 (Folios 286 to 287), DL 42/1/32/U1):

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.  A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

See details and research notes.

 

April or 15 May 1335

The Poachers At Large

In a case last heard on 3 October 1334, at a hearing at Pickering, again before Justices Richard Willoughby and John de Hambury at Easter 1335, a long list of offenders including Robert (FAR00031), son of Simon of Farndale (FAR00021), Roger del Milne of Farndale (FAR00013A), Robert (FAR00012), son of Peter de Farndale (FAR00008), Walter Blachose (BLA00001), Ralph del Heued (HEU00002), had still not been apprehended and were ordered for apprehension by the sheriff by the Tuesday three weeks after Michaelmas 1335 (ie by Tuesday 17 October 1335)(The Great Cowcher of the Duchy of Lancaster, The National Archives, DL42/1 Folio 277v to 278v).

See details and research notes.

 

17 October 1335 and 10 February 1337

More Poachers at Large

In a case last heard in April 1335, at a hearing at Pickering, again before Justices Richard Willoughby and John de Hambury at Easter 1335, a long list of offenders including Robert (FAR00031), son of Simon of Farndale (FAR00021), Roger del Milne of Farndale (FAR00013A), Robert (FAR00012), son of Peter de Farndale (FAR00008), Walter Blachose (BLA00001), Ralph del Heued (HEU00002), had still not been apprehended. As a follow up, on 10 February 1337, the original judicial panel of Richard Willoughby and John de Hambury were to be replaced by the King by a new judicial panel comprising two of Richard de la Pole, Richard, Robert de Hungerford and John de Hambury (The Great Cowcher of the Duchy of Lancaster, The National Archives, DL42/1 Folio 279 to 280v).

See details and research notes.

 

13 February 1337

In a case last heard on 17 October 1335, at a hearing at Pickering, before Justices John de Hambury and Richard de la Pole on 13 February 1337, a long list of offenders including Robert (FAR00031), son of Simon of Farndale (FAR00021), Roger del Milne of Farndale (FAR00013A), Robert (FAR00012), son of Peter de Farndale (FAR00008), Walter Blachose (BLA00001), Ralph del Heued (HEU00002) had still not been apprehended. The King ordered at Leicester on 1 October 1337 that a fresh writ be issued by Monday next after the feast of St Andrew the Apostle (The feast is on 30 November) with an adjourned hearing to Wednesday next after Ascension (39 days after Easter) 10 Edw. III (The Great Cowcher of the Duchy of Lancaster, The National Archives, DL42/1 Folio 280v to 282).

See details and research notes.

 

1 December 1337

In a case last heard on 13 February 1337, at a hearing at Pickering, before Justices John de Hambury and Richard de la Pole on 1 December 1337, a long list of offenders including Robert (FAR00031), son of Simon of Farndale (FAR00021), Roger del Milne of Farndale (FAR00013A), Robert (FAR00012), son of Peter de Farndale (FAR00008), Walter Blachose (BLA00001), Ralph del Heued (HEU00002), had still not been apprehended. (The Great Cowcher of the Duchy of Lancaster, The National Archives, DL42/1 Folio 282 to 283v).

See details and research notes.

 

16 March 1338

In a case last heard on 1 December 1337, at a hearing at Pickering, before Justices Richard Willoughby and John de Hambury on 16 March 1338, a long list of offenders including Robert (FAR00031), son of Simon of Farndale (FAR00021), Roger del Milne of Farndale (FAR00013A), Robert (FAR00012), son of Peter de Farndale (FAR00008), Walter Blachose (BLA00001), Ralph del Heued (HEU00002),  had still not been apprehended. (The Great Cowcher of the Duchy of Lancaster, The National Archives, DL42/1 Folio 283v to 284v).

See details and research notes.

 

21 September 1338

In a case last heard on 16 March 1338, at a hearing at Pickering, before Justices Richard Willoughby and John de Hambury on 21 or 28 September 1338, a long list of offenders including Robert (FAR00031), son of Simon of Farndale (FAR00021), Roger del Milne of Farndale (FAR00013A), Robert (FAR00012), son of Peter de Farndale (FAR00008), Walter Blachose (BLA00001), Ralph del Heued (HEU00002), had still not been apprehended. (The Great Cowcher of the Duchy of Lancaster, The National Archives, DL42/1 Folio 284v to 286).

See details and research notes.

 

5 April 1339

In a case last heard in September 1338, at a hearing at Pickering, before Justices Richard Willoughby and John de Hambury on 5 April 1339, a long list of offenders including Robert (FAR00031), son of Simon of Farndale (FAR00021), Roger del Milne of Farndale (FAR00013A), Robert (FAR00012), son of Peter de Farndale (FAR00008), Walter Blachose (BLA00001), Ralph del Heued (HEU00002), had still not been apprehended. (The Great Cowcher of the Duchy of Lancaster, The National Archives, DL42/1 Folio 286 to 287).

See details and research notes.

 

14 or 21 September 1339

In a case last heard on 5 April 1339, at a hearing at Pickering, before Justices Richard Willoughby and John de Hambury on 14 or 21 September 1339, a long list of offenders including Robert (FAR00031), son of Simon of Farndale (FAR00021), Roger del Milne of Farndale (FAR00013A), Robert (FAR00012), son of Peter de Farndale (FAR00008), Walter Blachose (BLA00001), Ralph del Heued (HEU00002), had still not been apprehended. Exacerbated at the lack of progress in apprehending the gang, the sheriff was ordered to hunt for them from county to county and if they were still not found, they were to be outlawed (The Great Cowcher of the Duchy of Lancaster, The National Archives, DL42/1 Folio 287 to 289v).

See details and research notes.

 

Fugitive gangmember

Robert seems to have became an outlawed vagrant, who might have poached and lived in the forest, escaping justice. If so, he seems to have been something of a Robin Hood character, though we can’t tell whether he was a noble rogue or a violent criminal.

 

1360

 

He might have died in about 1360.

 

 

 

How does Robert de Farndale relate to the modern family?

It is not possible to be accurate about the early family tree, before the recording of births, marriages and deaths in parish records, but we do have a lot of medieval material including important clues on relationships between individuals. The matrix of the family before about 1550 is the most probable structure based on the available evidence.

If it is accurate Robert de Farndale, was related to the thirteenth century ancestors of the modern Farndale family, but not on the direct line of ancestry of later Farndales.